If ever there was a reigning buzzword, “sustainability” might take the crown. And this is, arguably, an appropriate accolade given the urgency with which individuals and organisations must act in order to limit as far as possible the life-changing, planet-altering consequences of climate change. However, there is still significant mystery around
the term, which means its progress is often stifled as a result. Furthermore, “sustainable development” is often used seemingly interchangeably with “sustainability”, even on the UN’s website, and so it is always helpful to start with some definitions.
In 1987, sustainable development (and later, sustainability) was defined by the United Nations Brundtland Commission as development that “meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs”. In this white paper, the term “sustainability” is used with the deepest iteration of its definition, to refer to the process of providing for Earth’s current population, whilst actively ensuring Earth’s future population will also be able to survive and thrive. There are many tenets of this process, as will be discussed, but it is often depicted in a diagram with three intersecting circles (Figure 8). The diagram aids understanding by showing that for a process, project or goal to be “sustainable”, certain social, environmental and economic criteria must be met. For example, a project that seeks to promote sustainable agricultural practices with an end goal of protecting the physical environment, without any regard for the agricultural workers or the economic viability of the project, would not be considered sustainable. Transparency here is fundamental to the progress of sustainable practices across all industries, as it really is a holistic approach that is required.
A global focus on the concept of sustainability and sustainable development in policy can be traced back to 1972, where the UN Conference on the Human Environment attempted to examine the environmental consequences of human activity, and to “reconcile economic development with environmental integrity” (Purvis et al, 2018:683). Since this summit, there have been many iterations of the concepts around sustainable development, eco-development, environmentally sound development, even the Triple Bottom Line framework in accounting, but the common thread is this requirement of balancing economic, social and environmental factors in progress and development.